CategoriesDeforestation Economy Environment

Miyawaki Forest: Smart Solution for Greener Cities 2026

Cities are getting hotter. Green spaces are shrinking. Biodiversity is disappearing from urban landscapes at an alarming rate. The world urgently needs a smart, scalable, and proven solution. The Miyawaki Forest is exactly that.

This rapid urban reforestation method is transforming roadsides, school grounds, and barren plots into thriving ecosystems. It is gaining momentum across Asia, Europe, the Americas, and the Middle East. 

Quick Facts: Miyawaki Forest at a Glance

Factor Detail
Invented By Professor Akira Miyawaki, Japan (1970s)
Minimum Land Required As small as 9 sq meters
Planting Density 3 saplings per square meter
Growth Speed Up to 10x faster than conventional forests
Self-Sustaining After 2–3 years
Global Trees Planted 40+ million native trees worldwide
Also Known As Pocket Forest, Tiny Forest, Urban Mini-Forest

What Is a Miyawaki Forest?

Miyawaki Forest

A Miyawaki Forest is a dense, multi-layered plantation of native trees and shrubs. It is grown on very small plots of land. The method recreates the structure of a natural, mature forest but in a fraction of the time.                                            It is also known as a Tiny Forest or Pocket Forest. These names all refer to the same core concept: planting diverse native species in close proximity to mimic how nature builds forests.

The minimum land required is 9 square meters. This makes it perfect for cities where open land is scarce.

Who Was Akira Miyawaki?

Akira Miyawaki

The method is named after Professor Akira Miyawaki. He was a Japanese botanist and plant ecology expert. He spent over 40 years studying how native forests naturally regenerate.

His research led him to a powerful conclusion. If you plant the right native species, in the right density, the forest takes care of itself. He educated people on planting across more than 1,700 sites worldwide. Over 1,400 of those were in Japan alone. His work has resulted in the protection of more than 3,000 primary forests and the planting of over 40 million native trees globally. His legacy is now growing faster than ever.

The Core Principle: Potential Natural Vegetation

Potential Natural Vegetation

Every region on Earth has a natural plant community that would thrive there without human interference. Scientists call this the Potential Natural Vegetation (PNV).

The Miyawaki Forest method is built on this concept. Only species that belong naturally to a given area are selected. These indigenous plants have spent thousands of years adapting to the local soil, rainfall, and climate. They do not need fertilisers. They do not need pesticides. They simply grow.

This is what makes the approach fundamentally different from conventional tree planting.

How Does the Miyawaki Method Work?

Miyawaki Method Work

The science behind a Miyawaki Forest is elegant. When native trees are planted very close together, they compete for sunlight. This competition forces them to grow rapidly upward rather than spread sideways.

The result is fast, dense, vertical growth. The canopy closes quickly. It shades out weeds. Leaf litter builds up. Soil fertility improves. Insects, birds, and beneficial fungi arrive naturally. The entire ecosystem assembles itself.

After just two to three years, the forest becomes completely self-sustaining. No watering. No weeding. No maintenance required.

Studies and practitioners report that a Miyawaki Forest can grow up to 10 times faster than a conventional plantation. It can also support up to 30 times more biodiversity. It is worth noting that some ecologists have raised questions about these figures. The faster growth may reflect quicker ecological succession rather than raw tree height. This distinction matters for setting realistic expectations.

The 4-Step Planting Process

Planting a Miyawaki Forest follows a clear, structured process.

The 4-Step Planting Process

Step 1: Survey and Identify Native Species

The first step is to study the site carefully. Botanists identify which species would naturally grow within about 20 kilometres of the location. A recommended diversity range is 50 to 100 native species. Local and indigenous knowledge is invaluable at this stage.

Step 2: Prepare the Soil

Urban soils are often compacted and nutrient-poor. The soil is improved by digging pits and incorporating organic matter. Compost, manure, and dead vegetation are commonly used. A slight mound is sometimes built to mimic the natural forest floor. Cardboard and a thick layer of wood chips or compost are placed on top to suppress weeds and retain moisture.

Step 3: Dense Planting

Saplings up to 80 centimetres tall are planted at approximately 3 per square metre. No two saplings of the same species are placed next to each other. All species are planted at the same time. This random, diverse arrangement mirrors how a natural forest seed bank works.

Step 4: Early Maintenance

The forest needs watering and weeding for the first two to three years. This is the most demanding phase. After that, the forest becomes independent. The investment of time and effort in the early years pays off for decades.

Key Benefits of a Miyawaki Forest in Urban Areas

Key Benefits of a Miyawaki Forest in Urban Areas

A Miyawaki Forest delivers rapid environmental, social, and economic benefits, making it one of the most effective nature-based solutions for modern cities. 

Environmental Impact

A Miyawaki Forest delivers measurable environmental benefits quickly.

It sequesters carbon faster than slow-growing conventional forests. It creates a cooling microclimate that directly reduces the urban heat island effect. Dense canopy cover lowers local temperatures. Root systems improve water infiltration and reduce surface run-off. Soil erosion is significantly reduced on previously bare urban land.

Biodiversity Recovery

Urban areas are biological deserts for most wildlife. A Miyawaki Forest changes rapidly. The dense, layered structure provides habitat for birds, insects, pollinators, and soil organisms. Biodiversity appears within months of planting.

Community and Social Benefits

The benefits extend beyond ecology. UNESCO has actively endorsed the use of Miyawaki Forest planting within urban schools. Children learn directly about native ecosystems. Communities come together during planting events. Access to green space improves mental health and physical well-being.

Barren roadsides, abandoned lots, school yards, and even landfills have been transformed through this approach.

Long-Term Cost Efficiency

The upfront cost is higher than that of conventional tree planting. However, the long-term cost is very low. Once established, the forest needs almost no maintenance. It functions entirely on its own. For municipalities managing tight budgets, this is a significant advantage.

Miyawaki Forests Around the World

Miyawaki Forests Around the World

The global adoption of the Miyawaki Forest method tells a compelling story.

  • Japan remains the origin and heartland of the method. Thousands of sites have been established across the country since the 1970s.
  • India has seen rapid scaling. Shubhendu Sharma founded Afforestt and applied the Miyawaki method to urban plots across Indian cities. The model attracted global attention and inspired organizations worldwide.
  • Pakistan has embraced the method at a governmental level. The Parks and Horticulture Authority of Lahore announced plans to develop what was described as Asia’s largest Miyawaki urban forest. The project planned to plant 112,500 indigenous trees across 100 Kanals in China Park near Saggian Bridge. An additional 15 locations across Lahore were included in the plan. The Nature Conservation Society of Pakistan has also established Miyawaki Forest plots in Sialkot, within Shahab U Din Park.
  • The United States has seen projects in Cambridge, Massachusetts, where a forest was planted over a landfill in Danehy Park, and in Los Angeles, inside Griffith Park.
  • Brussels, Belgium, has planted a 770-square-meter pocket forest of 20 native species within the city.
  • The Yakama Nation in Washington State planted seven pocket forests of 47 native species on a rehabilitation facility, totalling over 23,000 square feet.

These examples span continents, climates, and cultures. The method adapts wherever the right expertise and commitment are applied.

Honest Assessment: Pros and Cons

No solution is without limitations. A balanced view of the Miyawaki Forest method is important for anyone considering it.

Advantages

  • Rapid establishment of a dense, functional forest on small urban land
  • High biodiversity from the earliest stages
  • Self-sustaining after just two to three years
  • Applicable on plots as small as 9 square meters
  • Builds community engagement and environmental awareness
  • Effective across diverse climates, including arid and semi-arid zones

Limitations and Criticisms

  • High upfront cost. Sourcing large numbers of native nursery saplings is expensive. Quality native stock is not always available.
  • Disputed growth claims. The widely cited “10x faster growth” figure has been questioned by forestry researchers. The evidence may reflect faster ecological succession rather than actual growth rates.
  • Not scalable for large areas. The method is intensive and impractical for reforesting vast tracts of land.
  • Water demands in early years. In dry or Mediterranean climates, the initial watering requirement can be costly and resource-intensive.
  • Expertise is essential. Without proper botanical knowledge, poorly chosen species can result in an ecologically weak or disorganized plant community.
  • Wildfire risk. In fire-prone regions, very dense planting can increase fire hazard. Modified, less dense planting is recommended in these areas.
  • CSR exploitation concerns. Some critics have raised concerns that the method has been promoted primarily to attract corporate social responsibility funding, without rigorous outcome monitoring.

Being aware of these limitations helps cities and organizations design better, more accountable projects.

Is a Miyawaki Forest Right for Your City?

Before starting a project, ask these practical questions.

Does the site receive adequate rainfall, or can water be supplied for the first three years? Is native nursery stock available locally? Is there a qualified botanist or ecologist available to guide species selection? Is the community willing to participate in early maintenance? Are there fire risk considerations that require adjusted planting density?

If the answers are largely yes, a Miyawaki Forest project is likely viable and worthwhile.

The Road Ahead: Miyawaki Forests in 2026

Miyawaki Forests in 2026

Urban heat, biodiversity collapse, and climate anxiety are defining challenges of this decade. City planners are under pressure to act. Nature-based solutions are moving from optional to essential.

The Miyawaki Forest fits perfectly into this shift. It works on small, affordable plots. It delivers results within years, not decades. It engages communities. It builds resilience.

In 2026, governments, schools, corporations, and neighbourhoods worldwide are increasingly choosing the Miyawaki method as part of their urban greening strategies. Pakistan’s large-scale government projects, UNESCO’s school programs, and grassroots NGO initiatives in dozens of countries all point in the same direction.

The question for cities is no longer whether to plant a Miyawaki Forest. The question is where to start.

Conclusion

The Miyawaki Forest is not a miracle solution. It is a well-researched, nature-based technique with a strong track record across diverse environments. It delivers rapid biodiversity gains, carbon sequestration, cooling effects, and community value to urban spaces that desperately need them.

Used thoughtfully, with proper expertise and honest expectations, it is one of the most powerful tools available to cities in 2026. Small forests can create large change. The time to plant is now.

For more informative blogs on topics like Islands of Pakistan and Gurudwara Janam Asthan Nankana Sahib, visit Chakor Blogs.

Sources

Frequently Asked Questions

Practitioners report growth up to 10 times faster than conventional forests. However, this figure refers to the rate of ecological development, not just tree height, and remains debated among scientists.

As little as 9 to 92 square meters is sufficient for a meaningful forest.

The standard density is approximately 3 saplings per square meter.

Yes, with adequate watering for the first 2 to 3 years. Projects have succeeded in Jordan, the Persian Gulf region, and parts of Pakistan.

Professor Akira Miyawaki, a Japanese botanist, developed and refined the method over four decades of research and field work.

cutting of tree in islamabad
CategoriesClimate Change Deforestation Economy Featured blog News

What Really Happened in Islamabad’s Tree-Cutting Drive?

A special report on the paper mulberry eradication campaign, the public backlash, competing claims of legality, and the long-term climate and economic cost of losing mature urban green cover.

ISLAMABAD: The drive along Shakarparian Road still feels familiar, until it doesn’t. One moment, the route is shaded by Islamabad’s old, settled tree canopy. Next, the green abruptly disappears, replaced by bare earth and freshly turned soil.

Along the roadside, labourers dig shallow pits. Nearby, pine saplings lie waiting for a plantation. A signboard makes its promise in bold letters: “Greener and Healthier Islamabad, Indigenous Tree Plantation.”

Yet, it is not the saplings that have captured the public’s attention; it is what is missing: decades-old, mature trees that once defined the capital’s identity.

In recent days, the cutting of trees in Islamabad has triggered widespread public anger, forcing explanations from the government, pushing environmental groups into the spotlight, and raising an uncomfortable debate about whether the city’s green cover is being sacrificed under the banner of public health and development.

LATEST UPDATE: “IHC Halts CDA from Cutting Trees in Islamabad”

On January 15, 2026, the Islamabad High Court directed CDA to immediately stop cutting of trees in Islamabad. The court issued this order after a petition alleging that the tree removal violated environmental laws was filed. The CDA is required to submit a detailed report, and notices were issued to the Pakistan Environmental Protection Agency and the Ministry of Climate Change. The hearing has been adjourned until February 2.

Why This Matters? | Cutting of Trees in Islamabad

cutting of trees in islamabad

Beyond the immediate controversy, the cutting of trees in Islamabad episode lays bare a deeper governance dilemma: how a modern capital balances public health, rapid development, and climate resilience. In urban terms, tree cover is not decoration; it is infrastructure.

It cools neighbourhoods, filters air, prevents soil erosion, buffers floods, and protects water resources. Its removal can have long-lasting economic and climate consequences that outlive any short-term administrative goals.

What Happened and Where? Cutting of Trees in Islamabad

cutting of trees in islamabad

 

Large-scale cutting of trees in Islamabad was reported at several locations in Islamabad, including:

  • Shakarparian National Park
  • H-8 (along a portion of the Islamabad Expressway, where a park is being upgraded)
  • Chak Shahzad (where decades-old trees were cut for the construction of a dual carriageway)

In Shakarparian, citizens claim at least four patches have been cleared, collectively spread over more than 15 acres near Lok Virsa, leaving large stretches resembling open, barren land.

The cutting of trees in Islamabad has remained a hot topic online, with residents sharing images and videos of deforested patches, questioning both the scale of the operation and the intent behind it.

The Official Position: Only Paper Mulberry Was Removed

Paper Mulberry cutting of trees in Islamabad

The government’s defence rests on one central claim: that the cutting of trees in Islamabad is not arbitrary, but targeted and legally backed.

Minister for Climate Change and Environmental Coordination Dr Musadiq Malik, speaking on Friday after chairing a meeting on the issue, stated that around 29,000 paper mulberry trees had been removed in Islamabad in line with the Supreme Court’s orders issued in 2023.

The minister said the directive was implemented again in 2025 to rid the city of what he described as an invasive, non-indigenous, and life-threatening species.

Paper mulberry, the minister claimed, is a major contributor to allergies and can cause fatal complications among chronic asthma patients. He added that the felling plan was finalised after confirming with the Ministry of Health that the species posed a major health concern.

“We are not planting non-indigenous species,” he said, adding that every tree chopped would be replaced at a ratio of one cut tree to three new saplings/trees.

The Capital Development Authority (CDA) also maintains that in Shakarparian, only paper mulberry trees were chopped down.

What the Numbers Say? | Cutting of Trees in Islamabad

According to CDA’s DG Environment Irfan Khan Niazi, the operation has proceeded under court directions with close supervision by CDA staff and documentation from cutting of trees in Islamabad to loading.

He stated:

  • approximately 12,000 paper mulberry trees were removed from F-9 Park
  • 8,700 were cut in Shakarparian
  • Additional locations, including H-8, were also included

In total, the CDA reports that 29,115 paper mulberry trees have been removed to date.

The Public’s Concern: ‘This Was Not Only Paper Mulberry’

cutting of trees in islamabad

Despite official assurances, residents insist the reality on the ground looks far broader than a targeted health operation.

In Shakarparian, citizens stated that besides paper mulberry, other trees also appeared to have been cut down, and that large swathes of tree cover were cleared in a manner inconsistent with a selective removal drive.

For many, the question is not merely “why was paper mulberry removed?” but:

  • Why was the removal so abrupt?
  • Why did it involve such large patches of cleared land?
  • and whether decades-old green cover can truly be replaced by saplings in any meaningful timeframe?

Development Projects: The Road and Housing Link | Cutting of Trees in Islamabad

In Chak Shahzad, cutting of trees in Islamabad was carried out for the construction of a dual carriageway intended to connect to a CDA-DHA-owned housing scheme from Park Road, linking the controversy directly to Islamabad’s real-estate expansion and infrastructure development model.

Cutting of trees in Islamabad, H8, took place where a park is being upgraded alongside the Expressway.

This intersection, between ecological removal drives and physical development projects, has strengthened public suspicion that cutting of trees in Islamabad may not be purely a health-driven intervention.

The WWF Report and the ‘Bigger Reality’

WWF-Pakistan report on cutting of trees in islamabad

Environmental groups argue that the issue is more complex than official explanations.

A WWF-Pakistan report criticised the recent removals and land clearing in Islamabad, stating that while the paper mulberry eradication drive is a major factor, extensive vegetation loss also stems from unchecked infrastructure development.

Field inspections conducted from December 2025 to January 2026 reportedly found large-scale clearing along:

  • H-8 Islamabad Expressway
  • Margalla Enclave Link Road
  • Shakarparian

The report raised concerns over:

  • lack of transparency
  • weak site-specific planning
  • monitoring gaps
  • incomplete restoration and exposed soil

Experts Warn: It’s Not Just Trees, It’s the City’s Climate System

Experts caution that even if paper mulberry removal is justified, the method matters.

Climate policy advocate Dr Zainab Naeem said the issue was not the removal itself but the alleged mismanagement, warning that the court-mandated phased approach, ecological assessment and prior afforestation steps appear to have been ignored. She stated native species such as shisham were reportedly also cut, as highlighted in WWF’s findings.

She described the move as climate misgovernance, warning that Islamabad is already developing an urban heat island effect due to concretisation and declining green buffers.

Water resources expert Dr Hassan Abbas warned that large-scale deforestation threatens:

  • groundwater recharge
  • temperature regulation
  • rainfall balance
  • ecological stability

He stressed that even public-health-driven removal must follow proper mechanisms, because replacing trees with concrete accelerates heating, disrupts rainfall patterns, and accelerates degradation.

The Economic Cost Behind the Environmental Cost | Cutting of Trees in Islamabad

cutting trees in islamabad

Beyond ecology, the cutting of trees in Islamabad canopy plays a direct economic role.

Urban analysts note that the loss of mature trees can lead to:

  • Higher electricity demand (cooling loads increase with higher temperatures)
  • Higher public health spending due to heat stress, dust, and air quality decline
  • increased stormwater runoff and greater risk of flooding, raising infrastructure repair costs
  • weaker livability, reducing quality-of-life indicators that sustain long-term urban value

In effect, while development projects may generate short-term economic activity through construction, poorly managed loss of ecological buffers can create long-term liabilities that quietly burden households and government alike.

Accountability Questions: What Was Approved, and Who Monitored?

The controversy has also revived core governance questions, especially in the context of environmental permissions:

  • Were site-specific ecological plans made public?
  • Were environmental assessments and approvals properly disclosed?
  • What independent monitoring existed beyond agency statements?
  • How was “only paper mulberry” verified on the ground?
  • Were permissions and licensing processes fully compliant?

Dr Malik directed that a transparent mechanism be developed to ensure compliance with laws, rules and procedures related to such campaigns, an indication that the current process may lack public confidence.

Notably, while official handouts discussed cutting in multiple sectors, they reportedly did not mention cutting of trees in Islamabad along Park Road in Chak Shahzad, raising further questions about disclosure.

CDA’s Plantation Response: A January Drive Amid Frost

Amid criticism, the CDA launched a plantation campaign in January, a month usually associated with frost and not traditionally viewed as ideal for mass plantation.

Historically, CDA plantation drives typically began around mid-February. This time, the plantation began over a month early in the Shakarparian area.

CDA officials defended the timing by stating that only suitable species, including Chir Pine, were being planted and that the drive aims to plant 30,000 trees, with greater momentum expected next month.

However, critics questioned whether the plantation effort was ecological restoration or merely damage control.

PM Takes Notice

After sustained pressure from citizens and civil society, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif took notice of the alleged cutting of trees in Islamabad and sought a report from the CDA.

The government’s response suggests recognition that public anger has moved beyond social media outrage into a politically sensitive urban governance issue.

The Bigger Debate: Health, Development and a City’s Identity

Islamabad’s paper mulberry dilemma is not a simple question of trees versus health. It is a debate about trust, transparency and what kind of capital Pakistan wants to build: one shaped by ecological planning, or one repeatedly “fixed” after irreversible damage.

So the question that arises here is: was this drastic approach truly necessary, or could public health have been protected without stripping the capital bare?

For more news on real estate and Special Reports, visit Chakor Ventures.